Vox News

Saturday, May 19th

Last update11:59:08 AM

  • Member/Join
  • Twitter
    Keeping an eye on the slimy little rats in Washington, the liars in the media & the scumbags on Wall Street is the grim reality we all face.
    Wednesday, 30 November 2011 01:58
    Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and the rest of the Republicans are actually made of the kind of cheese that comes in a spray can.
    Wednesday, 23 November 2011 08:32

Profile

Layout

Direction

Menu Style

Cpanel
You are here: Home Police State U.S.A. The Rampant Corruption

Washington Scum Pushes Robocall Law For Cell Phones

A recent PopVox poll of 9,800 Americans says 99% do not want Washington to allow telemarketers and bill collectors to be allowed to "robocall" our cell phones. Yet ten scumbag "representatives" in Congress are trying to sneak this disgusting invasion of privacy through.

House Resolution H.R.3035 - the bill collectors dream come true - a law that will fundamentally alter the life of American citizen's should this grotesque rollback of our rights to privacy pass through congress. It will mean that when you phone rings (which if this bill passes, it will be ringing a lot more than it does now)

Americans will have to go through more steps to determine if they want to answer it or not. Americans will now have to look at the number of the incoming caller to try to figure out if this a friend calling, or some fucking telemarketer, bill collector, shitty lawyer or fucking robot! And who pays for this invasion of privacy? Your minutes. Many Americans still use prepaid phones and do not have unlimited plans, but this is less about the money than it is about the constant invasion of our daily lives by these rats whose only interaction with us is that they want something from us. 

Now how is it that these ten slimy little rats in Washington would sponsor a bill in congress that nearly every single human being on earth is opposed to? Well that's simple, the same way that most of these rats in washington do what they do every day, they got payed off by the lobbyists to betray us all and sell us out! It's that simple. There is not a single citizen constituent in any district who called their "representative" and said "Gee, you know, I'm not getting enough annoying automated robotic collection agencies calling my cell phone while i'm trying to have sex with my lover, do you think maybe you could fix this?"

But it's now becoming clear what our mission is. It is becoming easy to track and expose each and every one of these slimy little rats. They can no longer hide their corruption. Websites such as www.govtrack.us www.popvox.com ,  www.opensecrets.org, www.infowars.com , www.tarpley.net , and www.voxnews.com  are busy tracking and exposing this scum and hopefully the people will know what to do come the next election - Clean the scum out of Washington!

Below is a list of the scum that is sponsoring the "ROBOCALL PRIVACY OBLITERATION LAW" it's easy now. Any congressman who sponsors, supports or votes for this disgusting violation of American citizen's rights to privacy is UN-AMERICAN and needs to be thrown out of office. It's a no brainer. Here's the list:

Rep. Lee Terry [R-NE2]

Marsha Blackburn [R-TN7]

John Gingrey [R-GA11]

Leonard Lance [R-NJ7]

Blaine Luetkemeyer [R-MO9]

David McKinley [R-WV1]

Mick Mulvaney [R-SC5]

Pete Olson [R-TX22]

Michael Rogers [R-MI8]

Edolphus Towns [D-NY10]

 

Open Secrets (exposing the slime in Washington)

Want to see how those slimy little scumbags in Washington are ripping us off and selling us out? OpenSecrets.org lays it all out. With just a click of a mouse you can match your slimy lawmaker's voting record with the bribes he takes from corporations to do their bidding. You can see in real time how the slime is ripping you off and stealing everything you have. 

Campaign finance reform is the NUMBER ONE way to clean the scum out of Washington and replace them with lawmakers who actually make laws in the best interest of the people. Demand campaign finance reform laws or you will be sold into slavery sooner than you think.

The Trial of George W. Bush and Tony Blair: The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal

bush behind bars

 19 November 2011 - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.  Today, seven judges of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal sat to hear formal charges against former President of the United States George W. Bush and former United Kingdom Prime Minister Tony Blair for Crimes  Against the Peace.

But before the actual proceedings could get underway, Defense Counsel Team Leader Jason Kay Kit Leon charged one of the Judges with bias.  Prosecutors characterized the allegation of bias and request for recusal as a "surprise" attack for which the Court had not had the opportunity to prepare.

Read more: The Trial of George W. Bush and Tony Blair: The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal

The Truth About The Jewish Lobby

 A Straight Look at the Jewish Lobby

By Mark Weber

For many years Israel has violated well established precepts of international law and has defied numerous United Nations resolutions in its occupation of conquered lands, in extra-judicial killings, and in its repeated acts of military aggression.

Most of the world regards Israel’s policies, and especially its oppression of Pal­estinians, as illegal and outrageous. This international consen­sus is reflected, for example, in numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel, which have been approved with overwhelming majorities.

“The whole world,“ said United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, “is demanding that Israel withdraw [from occupied Palestinian territories]. I don’t think the whole world... can be wrong.” [1]

Only in the United States do politicians and the media still fervently support Israel and defend its policies. For many years the US has provided Israel with crucial military, diplo­matic and financial backing, including more than $3 billion each year in aid.

Why is the US such a staunch bastion of support for Israel?

Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who was awarded the 1984 Nobel Peace Prize, has candidly identified the reason. Speaking to an audience in Boston, he said:

“But you know as well as I do that, somehow, the Israeli government is placed on a pedestal [in the US], and to criticize it is to be immediately dubbed anti-Semitic … People are scared in this country, to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful -- very powerful.” [2]

Bishop Tutu spoke the truth. Although Jews make up only two or three percent of the US population, they wield immense power and influ­ence – much more than any other ethnic or religious group.

As Jewish author and political science professor Benjamin Ginsberg has pointed out: [3]

“Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual and political life. Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade’s corporate mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely two percent of the nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief executive officers of the three major television networks and the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation’s larg­est newspaper chain and the most influential single newspaper, the New York Times... The role and influence of Jews in Ameri­can politics is equally marked...

“Jews are only three percent of the nation’s population and com­prise eleven percent of what this study defines as the nation’s elite. However, Jews constitute more than 25 percent of the elite journalists and publishers, more than 17 percent of the leaders of important voluntary and public interest organiza­tions, and more than 15 percent of the top ranking civil ser­vants.”

Stephen Steinlight, former Director of National Affairs of the American Jewish Committee, similarly notes the “disproportionate political power” of Jews, which is “pound for pound the greatest of any ethnic/cultural group in America.” He goes on to explain that “Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry.“ [4]

Two well-known Jewish writers, Seymour Lipset and Earl Raab, point­ed out in their 1995 book, Jews and the New American Scene: [5]

“During the last three decades Jews [in the United States] have made up 50 percent of the top two hundred intellectu­als... 20 percent of professors at the leading universities ... 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington ... 59 percent of the directors, writ­ers, and producers of the 50 top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers, and producers in two or more primetime television series.”

Vanity Fair magazine in October 2007 published a list of what it calls “the world’s most powerful people” – a lineup of the one hundred most influential media bosses, bankers, publishers, image makers, and so forth, who determine how we view ourselves and the world, and who – directly and indirectly -- shape our lives and our futures. Jews made up more than half of the powerful men and women on the Vanity Fair list, reported a leading Israeli newspaper, The Jerusalem Post. [6]

The influence of American Jewry in Washington, The Jerusalem Post has also noted, is “far disproportionate to the size of the community, Jewish leaders and US officials acknowledge. But so is the amount of money they contribute to [election] campaigns.” One member of the influential Conference of Presidents of Major Amer­ican Jewish Organizations “estimated Jews alone had contributed 50 percent of the funds for [President Bill] Clinton’s 1996 re-elec­tion campaign.” [7]

aipac lobby

Mother Jones magazine compiled a listing of the 400 leading contributors to the 2000 US national elections. Seven of the first ten were Jewish, as were twelve of the top 20, and 125 of the top 250. [8]

The single biggest donor to American politicians is Israeli billionaire and media mogul Haim Saban. In January 2007 it was revealed that he had donated approximately $13 million to various US political candidates. [9] The New York Times has noted Saban’s ardent devotion to the Jewish state: “He has since emerged as perhaps the most politically connected mogul in Hollywood, throwing his weight and money around Washington, and increasingly, the world, trying to influence all things Israeli. 'I’m a one-issue guy and my issue is Israel,' he said.” [10]

A Grip on Hollywood

“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture,” acknowledges Michael Medved, a well-known Jewish author and film critic. “Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie stu­dios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.” [11]

One person who has carefully studied this subject is Jonathan J. Goldberg, editor of the influential Jewish community weeklyForward. In his 1996 book, Jewish Power, he wrote: [12]

“In a few key sectors of the media, notably among Hollywood stu­dio executives, Jews are so numerically dominant that calling these businesses Jewish-controlled is little more than a sta­tistical observation …

“Hollywood at the end of the twentieth century is still an industry with a pronounced ethnic tinge. Virtually all the senior executives at the major studios are Jews. Writers, pro­ducers, and to a lesser degree directors are disproportionately Jewish -- one recent study showed the figure as high as 59 per­cent among top-grossing films.

“The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America’s most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power. They are a major source of money for Democratic candidates.”

“As a proud Jew,” writes Joel Stein, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, “I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood … I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.” [13]

Reflecting their role in the American media, Jews are routinely portrayed as high-minded, trustworthy, compassionate, and deserving of sympathy and support. While millions of Ameri­cans readily accept such imagery, not everyone is impressed. “I am very angry with some of the Jews,” complained actor Marlon Brando during a 1996 interview. “They know perfectly well what their responsibilities are... Hollywood is run by Jews. It’s owned by Jews, and they should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering.” [14]

A Well-Entrenched Factor

This intimidating power is not a new phenom­enon, but has long been an important factor in American life. In 1972, during a private White House meeting, President Richard Nixon and the Rev. Billy Graham spoke frankly about the Jewish grip on the media. “This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain,” said Graham, the nation’s best-known Christian evangelist. “You believe that?,” Nixon responded. “Yes, sir,” said Graham. “Oh, boy,” replied Nixon. “So do I. I can’t ever say that, but I believe it.” [15]

In 1978, Jewish American scholar Alfred M. Lilienthal wrote in his detailed study, The Zionist Connection: [16]

“How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American people?... It is the Jewish connection, the tribal solidarity among themselves and the amazing pull on non-Jews, that has molded this unprecedented power ... The Jewish connection covers all areas and reaches every level. Most Americans may not even sense this gigantic effort, but there is scarcely a Jew who is not touched by its tentacles…

“The extent and depth to which organized Jewry reached – and reaches – in the U.S. is indeed awesome … The most effective component of the Jewish connection is probably that of media control … Jews, toughened by centuries of persecution, have risen to places of prime importance in the business and financial world… Jewish wealth and acumen wields unprecedented power in the area of finance and investment banking, playing an important role in influencing U.S. policy toward the Middle East … In the larger metropolitan areas, the Jewish-Zionist connection thoroughly pervades affluent financial, commercial, social, entertainment, and art circles.”

Foreign Policy Role

Jews in Israel feel free to act brutally against Arabs, writes Is­raeli journalist Ari Shavit, “believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own.” [17]

In Britain, a veteran member of the House of Commons candidly declared in May 2003 that pro-Israel Jews had taken control of America’s foreign policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US and Britain into war in Iraq. Tam Dalyell, a Labour party deputy known as “Father of the House” because he is the longest-serving Member of Parliament, said: “A Jewish cabal have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy alliance with fundamentalist Christians … There is far too much Jewish influence in the United States.” [18]

Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, has spoken with blunt exasperation about the Jewish-Israeli hold on the United States: [19]

“I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing any­thing down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on.”

Today the danger has never been greater. Israel and Jewish organiza­tions are prodding the United States into new wars against Israel’s en­emies.

To sum up: Jews wield immense power and influence in the United States. The “Jewish lobby” is a decisive factor in US support for Israel. Jewish-Zionist interests are not identical to American in­terests. In fact, they often conflict.

As long as the “very powerful” Jewish lobby remains entrenched, there will be no end to the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US polit­ical system and the American media, the Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the Israeli threat to peace, and the bloody con­flict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East.

 

Notes

1. On April 8, 2002, in Madrid. Quoted in Forward (New York), April 19, 2002, p. 11.

2.  D. Tutu, “Apartheid in the Holy Land,” The Guardian (Britain), April 29, 2002.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,10551,706911,00.html )

3. Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (University of Chicago, 1993), pp. 1, 103. 

4. S. Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy,” Center for Immigration Studies, Nov. 2001.
http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/back1301.html )

5.  Seymour Martin Lipset and Earl Raab, Jews and the New American Scene (Harvard Univ. Press, 1995), pp. 26-27. 

6. N. Burstein, “Jewish power dominates at 'Vanity Fair',” The Jerusalem Post (Israel), Oct.12, 2007.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1191257286817&;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull )

7. Janine Zacharia, “The Unofficial Ambassadors of the Jewish State,” The Jerusalem Post (Israel), April 2, 2000. Reprinted in “Other Voices,” June 2000, p. OV-4, a supplement to The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

8. A. Cockburn, “The Uproar Over the Israel Lobby,” May 5 (or 8), 2006.
http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/2/2006/1368 )
http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn05082006.html )

9. “Israeli Billionaire Saban is Biggest Donor to US Politicians,” Ynet News (Israel), Jan. 23, 2007.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/1,7340,L-3355786,00.html )

10. A. R. Sorkin, “Schlepping to Moguldom,” The New York Times, Sept. 5, 2004.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/05/business/yourmoney/05sab.html )

11. M. Medved, “Is Hollywood Too Jewish?,” Moment, Vol. 21, No. 4 (1996), p. 37.

12. Jonathan Jeremy Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment (Addison-Wesley, 1996), pp. 280, 287-288. See also pp. 39-40, 290-291. 

13. J. Stein, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?,” Los Angeles Times, Dec. 19, 2008.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column )

14. Interview with Larry King, CNN network, April 5, 1996. “Brando Remarks,” Los Angeles Times, April 8, 1996, p. F4 (OC). A short time later, Brando was obliged to apologize for his remarks.    

15. “Nixon, Billy Graham Make Derogatory Comments About Jews on Tapes,” Chicago Tribune, March 1, 2002 (or Feb. 28, 2002)
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/02/Graham_Nixon.html );
“Billy Graham Apologizes for ’72 Remarks,” Associated Press, Los Angeles Times, March 2, 2002. “Graham Regrets Jewish Slur,” BBC News, March 2, 2002.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1850077.stm ) The conversation apparently took place on Feb. 1, 1972.

16. A. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1978), pp. 206, 209, 212, 218, 228, 229.

17. The New York Times, May 27, 1996. Shavit is identified as a columnist for Ha’aretz, a Hebrew-language Israeli daily newspaper, “from which this article is adapted.”

18. F. Nelson, “Anger Over Dalyell's 'Jewish Cabal' Slur,” The Scotsman (Edinburgh), May 5, 2003; M. White, “Dalyell Steps Up Attack On Levy,” The Guardian (London), May 6, 2003.
See also: M. Weber, “ Iraq: A War for Israel” ( http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/iraqwar.shtml ) 

19. Interview with Moorer, Aug. 24, 1983. Quoted in: Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby (Lawrence Hill, 1984 and 1985), p. 161.

#2016  Revised, updated: Feb. 2009


About the author

Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University (M.A., 1977).


Congressman Exposes Federal Reserve THEFT

The Federal Reserve is a privately owned criminal cartel of bankers who's principal purpose is to enrich the wealth of the owners of the private banks that comprise the Federal Reserve. The wellbeing of the American people is viewed by the Federal Reserve as an annoyance but one that can be dealt with.

The same billionaires who own the Federal Reserve also own the US media. And it is through their media that will pacify and quell any outrage from these annoying citizens. They are doing this because they see there is no chance that the US can remain competitive economically and so they are preparing for their own kind (bankers) the eventual collapse of this nation.

They are transferring the wealth of this nation into their own private holdings. And there is no accountability for this largest central bank in the world. They steal whatever they wish. They perpetrate this theft in complete secrecy. And they so without any fear of legal ramifications because they are the highest power in the nation.

The Federal Reserve needs to be NATIONALIZED. But there are few politicians who are courageous enough to take this position because they know that to do so means that they will lose their next election because whoever their opponent is in the next election will receive a tsunami of campaign contributions (covertly via corporations that the FED has instructed to do so)  and through this massive war chest the opponent will be able to utilize the television networks to trick the voters and unseat the politician who demanded reform of the Federal Reserve.

Read more: Congressman Exposes Federal Reserve THEFT